Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Hafner v. Scott et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Phillip B. Scott, Charity R. Clark and Sarah Copeland Hanzas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employment Discrimination
Clark v. Charles Schwab & Co. Inc.
as 1:2022cv03015
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Clark
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Stoddart v. Jolley et al
as 4:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Stoddart
Defendant:
Ryan W. Jolley, H. Alayne Bean and Daniel R. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Clark et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00788
Plaintiff:
Ashley Boureima Mourou, Sherrie Clark-Torrence, A.C. and others
Defendant:
Brandon Moore, Mark Seper, Michael Flatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L.G. Johnson, Jerry A. Johnson and Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas Rutledge, Joshua Canavan, Mary Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lu v. Clarke et al
as 1:2020cv12010
Defendant:
James R Clarke, Charles W Rankin, James L Sultan and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schifanelli v. Queen Anne's County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2020cv02906
Defendant:
Matthew Evans, Queen Anne's County, Michael R Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Gordana Schifanelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
