Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HAYNES v. S.C.I. HOUTZDALE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. HAYNES
Defendant:
S.C.I. HOUTZDALE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, DR. NAJI MUHAMMAD, TERRI SECHRENGOST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYNES v. THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv02848
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. HAYNES
Defendant:
THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spence et al v. Austin et al
as 4:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Bryan P Spence, Tyler W Stef, Ryan Corcoran and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J Austin, III, United States Department of Defense and Frank Kendall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Reaves v. Davidson et al
as 4:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Kathy J. Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
William H. Davidson, II, Davidson, Wren & DeMasters, P.A., South Carolina Div. of Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Smith v. J. Coleman, et al
as 20-35750
Respondent / Appellee:
J. COLEMAN, R. HAYNES and G. JONES
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN GARRETT SMITH
HAYNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv73284
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THORNY R HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Coleman
as 3:2020cv05319
Plaintiff:
John Garrett Smith
Defendant:
J Coleman
Respondent:
G Jones and R Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
