Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Smith v. Coleman
as 3:2020cv05319
Plaintiff:
John Garrett Smith
Defendant:
J Coleman
Respondent:
G Jones and R Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Berkey et al
as 3:2019cv06101
Plaintiff:
Kyntrel Trevyone Jackson and Sinister Daevayasnaham God
Defendant:
Rebecca A Citrak, Ronna Cole, William P Aurich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clifton R. Haynes Jr. v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 5:2019cv01276
Defendant:
Does and Kathleen Allison
Plaintiff:
Clifton R. Haynes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Haynes v. Colette Peters, et al
as 19-35314
Respondent / Appellee:
JERI TAYLOR, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution and COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, Department of Corrections, Board Member of Oregon, Board of Parole and Post-Supervision
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. HAYNES
Ball v. Haynes
as 3:2019cv05135
Petitioner:
Edmund F Ball, III
Respondent:
R Haynes and Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Victor Warren Properties, Inc. v. Haynes-Manning
as 1:2018cv04060
Plaintiff:
Victor Warren Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Mikki R. Haynes-Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAYNES v. FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv01984
Defendant:
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING INC and FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. HAYNES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Haynes v. Oregon B.O.P.P.P.S., et al
as 17-35496
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL R. HAYNES
Respondent - Appellee:
OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST PRISON SUPERVISION, COLETTE PETERS, Board Member and JERI TAYLOR, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
