Cases 81 - 90 of 454
Martin et al v. The United States of America
as 3:2019cv01663
Plaintiff:
John M. Martin and Michele R. Martin
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Servidio Landscaping, LLC et al v. Stamford et al
as 3:2019cv01473
Defendant:
David R. Martin, Dennis W. Patterson, Ralph Blessing and others
Plaintiff:
Rosanna Servidio, John Servidio and Servidio Landscaping, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Pryor
as 1:2019cv00147
Defendant:
Fredrick Pryor
Plaintiff:
Kendrick R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2019cv00150
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, SKYLA WALLACE, SHUNDA WOODS and others
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. SHARP et al
as 7:2019cv00149
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
P SMITH, DIXON, H COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lohr et al v. Kiefer-Erb et al
as 2:2019cv03755
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Mincks, Lt. Matthew R Martin, Officer Dustin Timberman and others
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Vanhorn, Robert Lohr and Robert L Lohr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROSA v. STEPHENS et al
as 2:2019cv01039
Defendant:
MR. BAGINI, HOMER STEPHENS, MR. MATTHEWS and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ROSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 0:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Schlafly v. Eagle Forum, et al
as 19-2798
Defendant / Appellant:
EAGLE FORUM
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD R. MARTIN, JR., MO, ESTATE OF PHYLLIS M. SCHLAFLY, JOHN F. SCHLAFLY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANDREW L. SCHLAFLY, on behalf of himself individually and on behalf of all other members of Eagle Forum, a non-profit membership corporation
MARTIN v. EMMONS
as 3:2019cv00091
Petitioner:
Kendrick R. Martin
Respondent:
Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
