Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Riddick v. Shaw
as 7:2026cv00596
Petitioner:
Rashad Matthew Riddick
Respondent:
Dr. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Rothschild & Co. et al
as 3:2026cv01087
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Rothschild & Co., Maye Musk, Tosca Musk and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Sullivan v. Bezos et al
as 3:2026cv00995
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bezos, Jackie Bezos, Preston Bezos and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Moss v. I.A.C., Inc.
as 3:2026cv00935
Plaintiff:
Deane Moss and Sherry McCargo Riddick
Defendant:
I.A.C., Inc. doing business as Industrial Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Gilbert Raynor v. US
as 26-6672
Plaintiff:
GILBERT R. RAYNOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES, PORTSMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Peterson v. Riddick
as 0:2026cv61644
Plaintiff:
Scot R. Peterson
Defendant:
Keith B. Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riddick v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00567
Plaintiff:
Martrica A Riddick
Defendant:
Commissioner Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Riddick v. Bisignano ***DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 2:26-cv-27-D.***
as 5:2026cv00363
Petitioner:
Ferrus Riddick
Respondent:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Green v. Grayson County District Attorney's Office et al
as 4:2026cv00565
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Green
Defendant:
Grayson County District Attorney's Office, Grayson County Detention Center, Kumar Suresh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
