Cases 41 - 50 of 173
Wieloszynski et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Shaffer, Robert Darin Searight, Theodore "Ted" Winston Nehrenberg and others
Defendant:
Roy's Plumbing, Inc., Scott Lawn Yard, Inc., City of Niagara Falls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
LOGAN v. L M MCCRANIE et al
as 3:2019cv03513
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO, R ROGERS, L M MCCRANIE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce RogersIn re: Bruce Rogers
as 19-6005
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: BRUCE R. ROGERS
Rogers v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2019cv02077
Plaintiff:
Johnny R. Rogers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Beard v. Jacobs et al
as 3:2019cv00441
Plaintiff:
Helen Beard
Defendant:
David Duckworth, Vicky B. Gregg, William F. Grieco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Outback Steakhouse of Florida, LLC et al v. Lin R. Rogers Electrical Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01303
Defendant:
Lin R. Rogers Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Outback Steakhouse of Florida, LLC and Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davydov v. Jacobs et al
as 3:2019cv00167
Defendant:
David Duckworth, Vicky B. Gregg, William F. Grieco and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Davydov
ROGERS et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv00573
Defendant:
CROWN BOILER, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, BRYANT HEATING AND COOLING and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. ROGERS, III and SUSAN M. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00125
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sharon R. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
