Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Cochran v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01121
Plaintiff:
Doris R Cochran
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Neubauer Perkins, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAYDEN v. BYERS et al
as 1:2015cv02084
Defendant:
S. BYERS, R. COCHRAN and SHAW
Plaintiff:
DAVID WAYNE HAYDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slye et al v. Stifel Nicolas & Co Inc
as 2:2015cv01518
Plaintiff:
Donald M Slye and Christopher R Cochrane
Defendant:
Stifel Nicolaus & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Cochrane v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00522
Defendant:
L. Adams, Alfasi, Romeo Aranas and others
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Cochrane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stifel Nicolaus & Company Incorporated v. Cochrane et al
as 1:2015cv01223
Plaintiff:
Stifel Nicolaus & Company Incorporated
Defendant:
Christopher R Cochrane and Donald M Slye
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00298
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cochran v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01264
Plaintiff:
Doris R Cochran
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc. , Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics, Smith & Nephew Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Cochran v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
as 3:2014cv02269
Plaintiff:
John R Cochran
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worthington et al v. DIMA S.L. et al
as 2:2014cv10908
Plaintiff:
Lori Worthington , Kimberly Conrad , Leona Roberts and others
Defendant:
DIMA S.L. , Neomedic International, S.L. , Neomedic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
