Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Conrad v. Phone Directories Company, Inc
as 12-6063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN R. CONRAD
Defendant - Appellee:
PHONE DIRECTORIES COMPANY, INC.
City of Charleston v. Boggess et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Charleston
Defendant:
Myron G. Boggess, William L. Gill, Eric N. Abilmona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Fitzgerald v. T & G Marketing, Inc. et al
as 9:2011cv80259
Plaintiff:
Patricia Dean Fitzgerald , Frank Matrozza and James Frazier
Defendant:
T & G Marketing, Inc., Thomas R. Conrad, Gloria L. Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Short v. Music et al
as 1:2010cv00355
Plaintiff:
Eric J Short
Defendant:
Robert K. Music, Brandon Wooten, Steven R. Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phone Directories Company v. Conrad
as 2:2009cv01121
Plaintiff:
Phone Directories Company
Defendant:
Sean R. Conrad
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Herrmann et al v. Conrad
as 1:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
Mary Herrmann and Christopher Herrmann
Defendant:
Sheldon R. Conrad
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bustillos v. Lappin et al
as 6:2009cv03007
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bustillos
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Michael Nalley, Marty C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brooks v. Lamartiniere, et al
as 08-30578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRIN L BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L LAMARTINIERE, JURN R CONRAD, KENNETH DUPIS and others
Sean Conrad v. Phone Directories Company, Inc, et al
as 07-6276
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SEAN R. CONRAD
Defendant - Appellant:
PHONE DIRECTORIES COMPANY, INC., MARC BINGHAM, individually and MIKE BINGHAM, individually
Sean Conrad v. Phone Directories Company, Inc, et al
as 07-6276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SEAN R. CONRAD
Defendant / Appellant:
PHONE DIRECTORIES COMPANY, INC., MARC BINGHAM, individually and MIKE BINGHAM, individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
