Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Patterson v. Novo Nordisk Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv07239
Plaintiff:
JOHN PATTERSON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PATTERSON v. MYERS et al
as 2:2026cv02073
Plaintiff:
TEVIN PATTERSON
Defendant:
C/O MYERS, C/O CONNORS, EVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, et al.
as 3:2026cv01333
Plaintiff:
Darleane Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Patterson v. General Motors LLC
as 5:2026cv05973
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Patterson
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Suggs v. Marquardt
as 2:2026cv01160
Plaintiff:
Anthony Suggs
Defendant:
Robert Marquardt, Tom Watson, Ms. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patterson v. City of New York
as 26-2604
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATTERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, JAVAD VALAD, BRIAN HINTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patterson v. Warden, Pinellas County Jail (Pinellas)
as 8:2026cv02681
Petitioner:
Mathew Patterson
Respondent:
Warden, Pinellas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Patterson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv01241
Plaintiff:
Douglas Patterson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
