Cases 11 - 20 of 491
Smith v. Wake et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Smith
Defendant:
N. Wake, Tim Garret and K. Shea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PALSON v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
COREY D. PALSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT M. ZAKEN, S. BUZAS, SECURITY C.O. I T. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Sheriff Larry Smith
as 6:2023cv00546
Petitioner:
Benito Contreras, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valance R. Smith, Sr. v. Coco Rehyole
as 5:2023cv02079
Petitioner:
Valance R. Smith, Sr.
Respondent:
Coco Rehyole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PRIESTER v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01605
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PRIESTER
Defendant:
M. ZAKEN, E. CHANG and R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. GEO Group, et al
as 23-2120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRESTON J. BLAKE
Defendant / Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INC., R. SMITH, J. BEAIRD, Wardens and others
MOKSHEFSKI v. SMITH et al
as 5:2023cv02941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOKSHEFSKI
Defendant:
JEFFREY R. SMITH, TODD HASKINS, PRIME CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins (PS) v. Meir et al
as 1:2023cv01870
Plaintiff:
Dashay Kennyada Collins
Defendant:
Meir, Steffani, Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv01355
Plaintiff:
John R Smith, Richard J Gritzenbach, II and Unknown Party
Defendant:
United States of America, Polk, County of, CoreCivic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mokshefski v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Michael Mokshefski
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Todd Haskins, Prime Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
