Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Ramsey v. Taylor et al
as 3:2023cv05537
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Justin Ramsey
Defendant:
Angela R. Taylor, Sumter County DSS, Sumter County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cinton Brown v. Clark R. Taylor
as 2:2023cv03366
Plaintiff:
Clinton Brown
Defendant:
Clark R. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mathis v. Taylor et al
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
John F. Mathis, Sr.
Defendant:
Treg R. Taylor and Antony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William Burrell, Jr., et al v. Tom Staff, et al
as 21-2846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. BURRELL, JR., JOSHUA HUZZARD and DAMPSEY STUCKEY
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM STAFF, Individually, LOUIS DENAPLES, individually, DOMINICK DENAPLES and others
Appellant:
ANTHONY CRAVATH, ANTHONY JOHN GOODWIN, JR., DERRICK M. LAKE and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gayles-El v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Devon A. Gayles-El
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Todd Ishee, Erik A. Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAYLOR v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv00375
Defendant:
RYAN DIENHART, KEITH CUTLIFF, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
VETRIA R. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Earl v. Taylor, et al.
as 1:2020cv01355
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council Baltimore City, Baltimore City Police Department, Detective Marcus R. Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Earl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
