Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ross v. Desroches et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ross
Defendant:
Pascal Desroches, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company and Affiliates, BNY Mellon Trust Compny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Ross v. Stephenson
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ross
Defendant:
Randall Stephenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Karen Mueller v. David Pojtinger, et al
as 21-1088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREN L. MUELLER
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID POJTINGER, STEPHANIE CANADY, DENNIS WICHT and others
Mueller v. Pojtinger et al
as 2:2020cv00688
Defendant:
Stephanie Canady, Dennis Wicht, Timothy Schumann and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Mueller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
George v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv01557
Defendant:
Michael Garcia, Abigail Dillon, Bonnie Dumanis and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jodi Fleming v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company, et al
as 19-3567
Defendant / Appellee:
CEO RANDALL STEPHENSON, JAMES TENCH, Senior Manager, WILLIAM A. BLASE, JR., Vice President of Human Resources and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JODI D. FLEMING
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv01694
Defendant:
Allan D. Lourie, United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson and Jeffrey L.G. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caffey v. Stephenson
as 4:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Eric L Caffey
Defendant:
Randall Stephenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anitra Crawford v. Randall Stephenson, et al
as 16-1164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITRA E CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL STEPHENSON, et. al.
Crawford v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2016cv10218
Plaintiff:
Anitra Elaine Crawford
Defendant:
Randall Stephenson, AT&T, Southfield OCC Library and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
