Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Randolph v. Collins et al
as 2:2026cv04481
Plaintiff:
Jordan Randolph
Defendant:
John B Collins, John J Toomey, Jennifer A Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dally v. Feltner et al
as 1:2026cv02141
Plaintiff:
Ryan Peter Dally
Defendant:
Dusty Feltner, Brent Weigle, Lauren A. Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Randolph v. O'Brien
as 6:2026cv02990
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Randolph
Defendant:
Ernest Michael Patrick O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Talbert v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2026cv03234
Plaintiff:
Herbert Talbert
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humbert v. Marshall et al
as 3:2026cv02040
Plaintiff:
Eric Humbert
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Michael Pugh, Marrcus Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Talbert v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2026cv01301
Plaintiff:
Herbert Talbert
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
First Horizon Bank v. Harps et al
as 1:2026cv04047
Plaintiff:
First Horizon Bank
Defendant:
Terrance D. Harps, Martin Jeffries, Mitchell A. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
v. Privy, Inc.
as 4:2026mc80208
Defendant:
Privy, Inc.
Trustee:
Randolph N. Osherow
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
SCOTT v. MARSHALL et al
as 7:2026cv00204
Plaintiff:
EARL RANDOLPH SCOTT
Defendant:
LT MOLLY MARSHALL and MR CHISOLM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Leon v. City of Bakersfield et al
as 1:2026cv05309
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Leon
Defendant:
City of Bakersfield, Kraig Guinn, Cameron Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
