Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Koby v. United States of America et al
as 5:2026cv00441
Defendant:
Nurse Brown, Nurse Coleman, Nurse Simons and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Koby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rabbi Bekhor, et al v. Church Mutual Insurance Company SI, et al
as 26-3780
Defendant:
Michael Hard and Church Mutual Insurance Co SI
Plaintiff:
The Chabad of Randolph Inc., Shari Bekhor and Rabbi Avraham Bekhor
Diggs v. Quinn et al
as 1:2026cv01483
Defendant:
Zoe Randolph, . Gray, Regina Futizuy and others
Plaintiff:
Demarkus Diggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar v. Maul, et al
as 26-1449
Defendant:
LACY MONDAY, PAMELA DANG and RANDOLPH MAUL
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MARK LAMAR
Stroup v. Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit Union
as 1:2026cv03081
Defendant:
Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Maureen T Stroup and Maureen T Stroup
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
McGowan v. Dawson
as 9:2026cv81482
Defendant:
Lauren Randolph Dawson
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alexander McGowan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Aror-Ark O'Diah, et al v. Johnny Walker, III, et al
as 26-5369
Defendant:
NYU Langone Health Pulmonary and Sleep Med Brooklyn, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Social Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
June Iona Bell, Erica Moses and Aror-Ark Ark O'Diah
Adventure Homes LLC v. Randolph Trucking Inc
as 3:2026cv01539
Plaintiff:
Adventure Homes LLC
Defendant:
Randolph Trucking Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Damages to Interstate Shipments by Motor Carriers
IN RE: BRIAN RANDOLPH
as 2:2026cv08090
Petitioner:
BRIAN RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
