Cases 1 - 10 of 15
John Fredrich Longo et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01744
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Fredrich Longo, Gregory Kevin Martin, Leon W Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Paul Warren v. Theresa Cisneros
as 21-71251
Petitioner:
PAUL RAYMOND WARREN
Respondent:
THERESA CISNEROS, Warden
Warren v. Davis
as 3:2019cv03607
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Raymond Warren
Defendant:
Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Warren v. Arnold, et al.
as 2:2018cv03109
Defendant:
Justin, C. Bayoneta, Mitchel and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Raymond Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Warden Solano State Prison et al
as 5:2018cv01447
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Raymond Warren
Defendant:
Warden Solano State Prison and Maya Norberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthis v. Somerset County Detention Center et al
as 1:2018cv00223
Plaintiff:
Raymond Warren Mathis
Defendant:
Somerset County Detention Center, Hickman, Rick Kato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Warren v. Dushan Zatecky
as 17-1630
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND WARREN
Respondent - Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent
WARREN v. ZETECKY
as 1:2016cv00919
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
RAYMOND WARREN
Respondent:
DUSHER ZETECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Warren v. Director of the VA DOC
as 14-6392
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND WARREN
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Warren v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 3:2012cv00396
Petitioner:
Raymond Warren
Respondent:
Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
