Cases 1 - 10 of 706
Reusch et al v. State of Kansas et al
as 6:2025cv03073
Plaintiff:
Mela JenaeLynn Reusch and Justin Lee Reeder
Defendant:
State of Kansas and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Heritage Railways, Inc., et al. v. Hirou, et al.
as 25-1740
Defendant:
BRADLEY ARTHUR HIROU, Bradley-Arthur Hirou and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN HERITAGE RAILWAYS, INC., OLD TUCSON ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, ALLEN C. HARPER and others
Reeder v. Cohen
as 9:2025cv01424
Petitioner:
Rishawn Reeder
Respondent:
Warden Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ginter, et al. v. Turner, et al.
as 1:2025cv00027
Plaintiff:
Robert Ginter and Pauline Mace
Defendant:
Scott Turner, Steve Wilkins, Vikki Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reeder v. Hendricks
as 25-43
Defendant:
K. MATTHEWS, ARISTEDES MAHAIRAS, JAMES HENDRICKS and others
Plaintiff:
RASZELL REEDER
WARRICK v. CLARK et al
as 2:2025cv00076
Defendant:
S. REEDER, DEPUTY BOWMAN, MAJOR A. REBER and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF WARRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Semper v. Hawaii Life Real Estate Services, LLC, et al.
as 24-6688
Defendant:
ALLAN B. KROLL, MACARTHUR & COMPANY, INC., JOHN T. CORREA and others
Plaintiff:
JEHAN SEMPER
Reeder v. Hendricks et al
as 1:2024cv08439
Defendant:
Bus Sgt. John Doe, Christopher A. Wray, K. Matthews and others
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01904
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
