Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bernstein, et al. v. Condominium Financial Management, Inc., et al.
as 26-4364
Plaintiff:
MARY BALLARD BERNSTEIN, Mary Helen Bernstein and ELIZABETH G. TIGANO
Defendant:
CONDOMINIUM FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, INC., BAY AREA PROPERTY SERVICES, INC., ANGIUS & TERRY, LLC and others
Reeder v. Christiansen et al
as 2:2026cv12325
Plaintiff:
Leonard Reeder
Defendant:
John Christiansen, Jansen, Turnwald and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Reeder & Vermaat, Inc. v. Innovative Water Care LLC et al
as 2:2026cv12308
Plaintiff:
Reeder & Vermaat, Inc.
Defendant:
Innovative Water Care LLC and Solenis LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Amar v. Shoemaker et al
as 3:2026cv00729
Plaintiff:
Phillip Amar
Defendant:
Rodney Shoemaker, Osburn Trucking, LLC, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Reeder v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv06300
Plaintiff:
Monica Breanne Reeder
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Rishawn Reeder v. Levern Cohen
as 26-6649
Petitioner:
RISHAWN REEDER
Respondent:
WARDEN LEVERN COHEN
Karl W Schenker v. Charles Reeder et al
as 3:2026cv00417
Plaintiff:
Karl W. Schenker
Defendant:
Charles Reeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeder v. Benton County et al
as 4:2026cv05081
Defendant:
Benton County, Elias Perez and Mike Clark
Plaintiff:
Dana Reeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
SMART v. DOE et al
as 5:2026cv00126
Plaintiff:
TEQUAN SMART
Defendant:
JANE DOE, WARE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schenker v. Reeder et al
as 3:2026cv00333
Plaintiff:
Karl W. Schenker
Defendant:
Reeder, John Henley, Corr. Officer "Mac" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
