Cases 1 - 10 of 18
JACKSON v. DEPUTY WARDEN REGINALD CLARK
as 5:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN REGINALD CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamonte, Jr. v. Pierce et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr. and Al-Kareem-Khalil
Defendant:
Special Agent Matthew Pierce, G.D.C. Criminal Investigation Division, G.D.C. Office of Professional Standards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Reginald Clark v. Jacqueline Smith
as 22-6958
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE SMITH, ANNA DEMEKA BELL, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Lumberton Correctional Institution and others
Clark v. Smith et al
as 5:2021ct03323
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clark
Defendant:
Jacqueline Smith, Anna Demeka Bell, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eshelman et al v. MPFP, LLC
as 4:2020cv03119
Defendant:
MPFP, LLC and MPFP, LLC doing business as Marco's Pizza
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clark and Mary Ann Eshelman
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv20602
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. US Attorney Office
as 3:2018cv00522
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clark
Defendant:
US Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2016cv00592
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clark
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Suzann Bailey, Vipen Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. ASC Mortgage et al
as 3:2014cv04236
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clark
Defendant:
ASC Mortgage, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and Doe Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
