Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 152
Courthouse News Service v. Jacqueline Smith
as 22-2110
Plaintiff / Appellant: COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee: JACQUELINE C. SMITH, in her official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for Prince William County, Virginia
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Amicus Curiae: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 38 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS
Pro Publica, Inc. v. Butler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01455
Plaintiff: Pro Publica, Inc.
Defendant: Commander Derek D. Butler, Vice Admiral Darse E. Crandall, Carlos Del Toro and others
Amicus Curiae: The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and National Institute of Military Justice, et. al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 ij Injunction
Mahendra Amin v. Don Winslow
as 22-55872
Plaintiff / Appellee: MAHENDRA AMIN, M.D.; Dr.
Defendant / Appellant: DON WINSLOW
Amicus Curiae: ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, and 32 media organizations
Doe v. Volokh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1525
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOHN DOE
Intervenor: EUGENE VOLOKH
Defendant: NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LISBON, NH
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATED PRESS, BOSTON GLOBE MEDIA PARTNERS, LLC, CALIFORNIANS AWARE and others
Jane Sullivan, et al v. University of Washington, et al
as 22-35338
Plaintiff / Appellee: JANE SULLIVAN and P. POES, 1-75; Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings, University of Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, 16 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS and ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Palin v. The New York Times Company
as 22-558
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sarah Palin, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: The New York Times Company and James Bennet, an individual
Petitioner: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 52 Media Organizations
Martinez et al v. The City of Fresno We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00307
Plaintiff: Desiree Martinez, Fresno Homeless Union, Faith in the Valley and others
Defendant: The City of Fresno
Amicus Curiae: First Amendment Coalition, California News Publishers Association, Californians Aware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. United States Customs and Border Protection, et al
as 21-5293
Plaintiff / Appellee: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Defendant / Appellant: United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Department of Homeland Security
NetChoice v. Paxton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee: NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant: Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae: Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court: Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
NetChoice LLC et al v. Paxton
as 1:2021cv00840
Plaintiff: NetChoice LLC a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association a 501(c)(6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant: Ken Paxton
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Progress, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The American Civil Liberties Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?