Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Davis v. Department of Mental Health (SLPRC)
as 4:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Ricky Davis
Defendant:
Department of Mental Health (SLPRC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MacDermid Printing Solutions LLC v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
MacDermid Printing Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Henry Ricky Davis and Flint Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Davis v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ricky Davis
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv04896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv04898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Davi
as 08-4069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICKY DAVIS
Davis v. Skoog et al
as 2:2007cv12860
Plaintiff:
Ricky Davis
Defendant:
Linda Skoog, Eric Rodgers, David E Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
B v. DUNNAM, et al
as 1:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
J O B
Defendant:
TRACY DUNNAM, RICKY DAVIS, ANTHONY CANCHOLLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Alabama Protective Services Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00678
Plaintiff:
Ricky Davis
Defendant:
Alabama Protective Services Inc., Alabama Protective Services Inc., Elite Security Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Washington et al v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2007cv03075
Plaintiff:
Larry M Washington, Larry M Washington, Larry M Washington and others
Defendant:
City of Springfield, City of Springfield, Paul Carpenter and others
Movant:
Illinois State Police, Division of Internal Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
