Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hull v. Bartow County Jail
as 4:2026cv00210
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Hull
Respondent:
Bartow County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Falcon et al
as 3:2026cv00686
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
Christopher J. Falcon and Susan Madsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hull v. Bartow County Superior Court et al
as 4:2026cv00187
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Hull
Respondent:
Bartow County Superior Court and Judge Rosemary Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monroe v. Roane County Jail et al
as 1:2026cv00166
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Monroe
Defendant:
Roane County Jail and Roane County, TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Marcodocco
as 3:2026cv00537
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
A. Marcodocco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Kincaid
as 1:2026cv01580
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
Sheriff Stacey A. Kincaid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Reed v. Azcarate et al
as 3:2026cv00476
Defendant:
Penny S. Azcarate doing business as Magistrate Administrator, Steven Descano doing business as Chief Commonwealth Attorney for VA, Kelsey R. Gill doing business as Deputy Commonwealth Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hull v. Wall et al
as 4:2026cv00119
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Hull
Defendant:
Deputy Wall and Correct Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitka v. Blanche
as 26-2620
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW MITKA
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
WELCH v. OWENS et al
as 1:2026cv00383
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW WELCH
Defendant:
SGT. OWENS, OSBORNE, MANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
