Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Robert Reed v. Commissioner United States Parole Commission, et al
as 24-1687
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED, a/k/a Robert Andrew Bey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and CHRISTOPHER WHITMER, U.S. Parole Examiner Employee
Robert Andrew Trujillo v. Captain Gore J. Doerer et al
as 2:2024cv03170
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Trujillo
Respondent:
Captain Gore J. Doerer and B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robert Andrew-Bey v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5069
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew-Bey
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland and Muriel Bowser
Reed v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Reed
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sharp v. The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr.
Defendant:
The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin and Joshua Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Snider v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2023cv02145
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Snider, Jr.
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Dr. White, Accredited Correctional Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitley v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
Pamela C. Whitley
Defendant:
Billy Woods, Robert Andrew Walters, Ashleigh Snodgrass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2023cv03117
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, CHRISTOPHER WHITMER and COLLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
