Cases 11 - 20 of 23
GARNER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04634
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE GARNER, III , ANGELA GARNER , DEVON MCDONALD and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garner, III v. National Football League et al
as 1:2012cv22680
Plaintiff:
Charlie Garner, III , Angela Garner , Devon McDonald and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopson v. Burnette et al
as 3:2011cv00317
Plaintiff:
Donald G Hopson, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Burnette and Steven Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardaway et al v. Employbridge of Dallas, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03200
Plaintiff:
Brian Hardaway , Jerome Harvey , Tyrone Turner and others
Defendant:
Employbridge of Dallas, Inc. and Staffing Solutions Southeast, Inc. d/b/a Prologistix, Prodrivers, and ResourceMFG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burnett v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2010cv00617
Plaintiff:
Robert Burnett
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Robert Burnett v. A P Green Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91699
Plaintiff:
Robert Burnett
Defendant:
A P Green Industries, Inc
Keels v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 9:2009cv00122
Petitioner:
Robert Burnett Keels
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnett-EL v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00932
Petitioner:
Robert Burnett-EL
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at00546
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
