Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Parker v. SoClean Inc
as 2:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. PARKER
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parker v. SoClean Inc
as 3:2022cv05487
Plaintiff:
Robert E Parker
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc. and SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv86001
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kopp et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02241
Plaintiff:
Frank Allen Kopp , FGJKopp , Ernest Henry Thomsen and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Schmidt v. Robert Parker, et al
as 15-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. PARKER, Attorney at Law, jointly, severally, CATHOLINE GORTSCH, Attorney at Law, jointly, severally, PARKER AND PARKER, Attorneys at Law, jointly, severally and others
Reddy v. Catone et al
as 5:2013cv00707
Plaintiff:
Deepika Reddy
Defendant:
Louis J. Catone, Donald T. Sheridan, Robert E. Parker, DDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schmidt #779266 v. Parker et al
as 1:2011cv01133
Plaintiff:
James Edward Schmidt #779266
Defendant:
Robert E. Parker, Catholine Gortsch, Parker and Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fraser v. Law Offices of Parker and Parker et al
as 2:2011cv10585
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Fraser
Defendant:
Law Offices of Parker and Parker , Robert E Parker , Tara Black and others
PARKER v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv00843
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. PARKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robert E. Parker v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., et al.
as MSS/1:05-CV-00535
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Parker
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
