Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harrison v. Hago et al
as 1:2016cv06366
Defendant:
Court Officer Weyhi Hago and Court Officer David Kallick
Plaintiff:
Robert Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
AFS Technologies, Inc. v. Harrison et al
as 1:2014cv00496
Plaintiff:
AFS Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Harrison and Henry Vander Waal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carolyn Lewis v. Johnson & Johnson
as 14-1244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROLYN LEWIS
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEWIS, AUGUSTINA BROWN-SINGLETARY, ANDRE SINGLETARY-SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, GYNECARE and AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Hanwha General Ins. Co., Ltd v. Northern & Western Insurance Co, Ltd et al
as 4:2014cv00305
Plaintiff:
Hanwha General Ins. Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Northern & Western Insurance Co, Ltd, Supra Management Solutions, Inc., Devon Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
AFS Technologies, Inc. v. Harrison et al
as 3:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
AFS Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Harrison and Henry Vander Waal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vander Waal et al v. AFS Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Henry Vander Waal and Robert Harrison
Defendant:
AFS Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene, Jr. v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01561
Plaintiff:
Robert Harrison Greene, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tyus v. Newton et al
as 3:2013cv01726
Plaintiff:
Gerjuan Tyus
Defendant:
Roger Newton , City of New London , County of New London and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25325
Plaintiff:
Karin Harrison and Robert Harrison
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
