Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wagoner v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv13291
Plaintiff:
Robert Wagoner
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wagoner et al v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv09030
Plaintiff:
Bev Zahra Wagoner and Robert Wagoner
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellendorf et al v. DirectTV, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv22861
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ELLENDORF , HARRY ADAMS , ANGEL AVILA and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC and MASTEC NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Simpson Performance Products, Inc. et al v. Wagoner et al
as 2:2015cv00213
Plaintiff:
Simpson Performance Products, Inc. and SFI Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Wagoner and Derek Randall Cathcart
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Simpson Performance Products, Inc. et al v. Wagoner et al
as 5:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Simpson Performance Products, Inc. and SFI Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Wagoner and Derek Randall Cathcart
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Simpson Performance Products, Inc. et al v. Wagoner et al
as 3:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Simpson Performance Products, Inc. and SFI Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Wagoner and Derek Randall Cathcart
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wagoner et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02095
Plaintiff:
Rita Wagoner and Robert Wagoner
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wagoner v. Hull et al
as 2:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Robert Wagoner
Defendant:
Mr. Hull and Mrs. Neil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Wagoner
as 3:2010cv01242
Plaintiff:
Keith Campbell
Defendant:
Robert Wagoner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
