Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Reyes v. Louisville Bedding Company et al
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Elvia Reyes
Defendant:
Louisville Bedding Company, Stephen Elias, Unknown Elias and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Mark Nance v. Warden, et al
as 19-10052
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBIN OWENS, D/W Care and Treatment, CYTHIA RIVERS, Chief Counselor, ASHRAF NOORI, Counselor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ELLERY NANCE
Nance v. Morales et al
as 4:2018cv00165
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Mr. Toole, Robin Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ellery Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Sanks et al
as 4:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Roland Jones, Keith Sade, Jason Ellis and others
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Nathan Brooks, Robin Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadnax v. The State of Georgia et al
as 4:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
Daquan Broadnax
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Jose Morales, Homer Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00779
Plaintiff:
Robin Owens
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Siegel v. Visa, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02571
Plaintiff:
Sam Siegel
Defendant:
Visa, Inc., VISA USA, Inc., Inovant LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Araujo, et al v. Providence, RI, et al
as 08-2417
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence and URBANO PRIGNANO, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Chief of Police for the City of Providence
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its treasurer, Steven T. Napolitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Walden, et al v. Lennon, et al
as 08-1536
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its Treasurer, Steven T. Naplitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Walden, et al v. Providence, RI by and through, et al
as 08-1535
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
