Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Seidu Iddrissu, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-2349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEIDU IDDRISSU and ROBIN SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, KEVIN RIDDLE, Field Office Director, Chicago Field Office, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and DAVID H. WETMORE, Chairman, Board of Immigration Appeals
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sanders v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv04127
Plaintiff:
Robin Sanders
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2012cv11246
Plaintiff:
Robin Sanders
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fink v. Regis Corp et al
as 3:2011cv01873
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Fink
Defendant:
Regis Corp , Jessie Love , Michael O'Banion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Sadisco South
as 1:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Robin Sanders
Defendant:
Sadisco South
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-50243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Robin Sanders v. OMG IV, Limited et al
as 2:2007cv05193
Plaintiff:
Robin Sanders and Robin Sanders
Defendant:
OMG IV, Limited, Hill Country Interests, Inc., Beta Corp Management Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
