Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Roger Graham v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 20-2999
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor, MICHELLE LAFLOWER, NIKKI TAFOYA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER GRAHAM
Graham v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2020cv00393
Petitioner:
Roger Graham
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAHAM v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv03277
Plaintiff:
ROGER GRAHAM
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT E. CARTER and DUANE ALSIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Moore v. Tommy Fegan, et al
as 19-1216
Defendant:
[UNKNOWN] MICHAEL MCLEAN, [UNKNOWN] NORTON, CARL CRESS, Regional Business Manager and others
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] BENSON, Mr. Correctional Officer, ROGER GRAHAM, Superintendent and TOMMY FEGAN, named as AKA Tom Fegan, Supervisor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY LAMONT MOORE
GRAHAM v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2019cv00851
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ALEYCIA MCCULLOUGH, MICHELLE LAFLOWER and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bigelow #244511 v. McQuiggin et al
as 2:2011cv00468
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeffrey Bigelow #244511
Defendant:
Greg McQuiggin, Jacqueline Nadeau, Colleen Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovely #210684 v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lovely #210684
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Veda Dove, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovely #210684 v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lovely #210684
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Donald "Rick" Bonnee, Jr., Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
