Cases 1 - 10 of 8,379
Wallace v. Koehnlein et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Trayshaun Wallace
Defendant:
Roger Koehnlein and Brandon Schulz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ussery v. Law Office of Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Roger Ussery
Defendant:
Law Office of Public Defender and Kelly Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Mills v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11332
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROGER MILLS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Burchfield v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Robert W Burchfield
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility, Corporal Reece LNU, Nurse Jones LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Clifford Marshall
Defendant:
Tyrell Davis, Danny Roe, Sgt. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lobley v. Harris
as 4:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Terrell Onterial Lobley
Respondent:
Don Harris
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Charles, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 24-20169
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rogers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Murphy v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Larry Darnell Murphy
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Rogers v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
John William Rogers
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
