Cases 31 - 40 of 729
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. County of Cook, et al
as 23-2239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIEAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR. and LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF COOK, THOMAS J. DART, JOHN MUELLER and others
Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. Jeelan Muhammad, et al
as 23-2371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEELAN MUHAMMAD, SUSAN SHEBEL, VELINDA LLORENS and others
Roundtree v. Muhammad et al
as 1:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Jeelan Muhammad, Susan Shebel, Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hotchkiss v. Cedar Rapids Community School District, et al
as 1:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Russell Hotchkiss
Defendant:
Cedar Rapids Community School District, Russ Bush, Tawana Grover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Roundtree v. Supt. Rocco et al
as 1:2023cv02945
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Supt. Rocco, Ms. Mitchell, L. Fenderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree v. Lucil et al
as 1:2023cv02948
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Lashawn Roundtree, Jr.
Defendant:
Lucil, Cobble, Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree-McCrorey v. Department of Housing
as 3:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey and Isis Doe
Defendant:
Department of Housing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Roundtree v. Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2023cv01701
Plaintiff:
Justice T C Roundtree
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Michael Roundtree, Jr. v. USA
as 23-11487
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY ROUNDTREE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
