Cases 1 - 10 of 196
Rowell et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B. Rowell
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00189
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 5:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Ramirez v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, E. McDaniel, Mehta Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flora v. United States Of America
as 5:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Rowell Flora
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rowell v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rowell v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv01345
Petitioner:
Denard A Rowell
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Pearl River County, Miss et al
as 1:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Timothy Franklin Harris
Defendant:
Pearl River County, Miss and Lenoir Rowell Criminal Justice Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
