Cases 1 - 10 of 10
US v. Frumencio Soto-Pineda
as 22-4283
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRUMENCIO SOTO-PINEDA, a/k/a Emilio Gusman, a/k/a Ruben Campos-Arrollo
US v. Ruben Campos-Arrollo
as 22-4274
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RUBEN CAMPOS-ARROLLO, a/k/a Frumencio Soto-Pineda
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2020cv06112
Defendant:
DAVID VALENTIN, VICTOR MOYAO, MICHELLE MONREAL and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campos v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv14288
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Campos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPOS v. THE DEPARTMENT OF NORTH HAMPTON COUNTY PRISON CRIME CARE, MEDICAL
as 5:2014cv01405
Plaintiff:
FELIX RUBEN CAMPOS
Defendant:
THE DEPARTMENT OF NORTH HAMPTON COUNTY PRISON CRIME CARE, MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campos-Arrollo v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2011cv00135
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, GEO Group, United States Of America and others
Petitioner:
Ruben Campos-Arrollo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campos Montes v. USA
as 3:2011cv02848
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ruben Campos Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Arrollo v. USA et al
as 4:2010cv00079
Petitioner:
Ruben Campos Arrollo
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Attorney General, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arrollo v. USA et al
as 3:2010cv00068
Petitioner:
Ruben Campos Arrollo
Respondent:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ruben Campos-Arrollo v. USA
as 10-10933
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUBEN CAMPOS-ARROLLO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
