Cases 41 - 50 of 1,902
Ralston v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Andy Ralston
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, M. Davis, E.D. Sales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myriee v. Ruiz et al
as 1:2023cv09491
Plaintiff:
Ramal Myriee
Defendant:
Veronica Ruiz, Genevieve Switz, Ashley Baker-Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Angel P Ruiz
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Centurion Health Incorporated, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ruiz v. Hijar
as 3:2023cv00393
Petitioner:
Manueal Ruiz
Respondent:
Sandra Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alarcon v. Adult Parole Board et al
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Luis F Alarcon
Defendant:
Adult Parole Board, Kristina Ruiz, Amy Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz-Lopez v. Velasquez-Rivera
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Ruiz-Lopez
Defendant:
Benjamin Velasquez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz-Cortez (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2023cv02733
Petitioner:
Salvador Ruiz-Cortez
Respondent:
Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Palomar v. Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv02329
Plaintiff:
George Ruiz Palomar, II
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Darrell Rowen, Rachel Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. U S Government
as 5:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Rafael Verdejo Ruiz
Respondent:
U S Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
