Cases 1 - 10 of 16
USA v. Sandra Parker
as 23-3205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Sandra Ruth Parker
PARKER v. CHRISTEN
as 1:2022cv03816
Plaintiff:
RUTH PARKER
Defendant:
CHRISTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. PROUD BOYS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2021cv03267
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
PROUD BOYS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C., OATH KEEPERS, RYAN ASHLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Larry Southern v. Richard H. Bishoff, PC
as 15-2008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY SOUTHERN, ROY SOUTHERN, YVONNE HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
LUCILLE SOUTHERN, ODELL PARKER and RUTH PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD H. BISHOFF, PC, RICHARD H. BISHOFF, JOHN M. DEAKLE and others
Defendant:
ASBESTOS PROCESSING LLC, A. JOEL BENTLEY LAW OFFICE, CHARLES G. BLACKWELL, JR. and others
Intervenor:
WILLIAM HOWELL MORRISON
Parker v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv20088
Plaintiff:
Ruth Parker
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. CAREY et al
as 2:2012cv04267
Plaintiff:
RUTH PARKER
Defendant:
DENNIS L. CAREY and DIANE CAREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker et al v. Asbestos Processing, LLC et al
as 3:2012mc00419
Plaintiff:
Odell Parker, Ruth Parker and Larry Southern
Defendant:
Asbestos Processing, LLC, Richard H. Bishoff, Richard H. Bishoff, PC and others
Movant:
Crymes G. Pittman and Rance N. Ulmer
Southern v. Asbestos Processing LLC et al
as 0:2011cv01800
Plaintiff:
Lucille Southern , Odell Parker , Ruth Parker and others
Defendant:
Asbestos Processing LLC, Richard H Bishoff PC, Richard H Bishoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
