Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv05777
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Griepsma v. Holbrook et al
as 2:2020cv00930
Defendant:
Dahl, Robert Smith, Torrescano and others
Plaintiff:
James D Griepsma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv16391
Defendant:
SARGENT C. DONET, THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SARGENT P.A RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
ASMAR THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez-Valle et al v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv01546
Plaintiff:
Melitza Lopez-Valle, Raily Feliciano, Conyugal Partnership Feliciano-Lopez and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Henson v. Brown et al
as 1:2018cv00674
Plaintiff:
Darlene Henson
Defendant:
Stephanie Brown , Charles Brown and Raily Mtn. Lake Vacations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Myers v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Terence Myers
Defendant:
T Raily, Sgt McMorris, Capt Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomasson v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2013cv20106
Plaintiff:
Raili Thomasson
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Joseph Thompson v. Doctor Warr, et al
as 12-10096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR WARR and NURSE RAILY
Thompson v. The Russell County Sheriff Department et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2011cv00258
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thompson
Defendant:
The Russell County Sheriff Department, The Russell County Medical Department, Heath Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. The Sheriff of Russell County (INMATE 1)
as 3:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thompson
Defendant:
The Sheriff of Russell County, Doctor Warr and Nurse Raily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
