Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Armstrong v. USA
as 6:2019cv00422
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ralph Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ralph Armstrong v. United Industries Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv02519
Plaintiff:
Ralph Armstrong
Defendant:
Does, Spectrum and United Industries Corporation
Holmes v. Farmers Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv00039
Defendant:
Acorn Outdoor Services, Ralph Armstrong and Farmers Insurance Company
Notice Only:
Theodore V. Fish
Plaintiff:
John Henry Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ralph Armstrong v. Ray Hobb
as 11-1049
Petitioner - Appellant:
Ralph Armstrong
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Bel Air Mart et al v. Arnold Cleaners, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02392
Plaintiff:
Bel Air Mart and Wong Family Investors, L.P.
Defendant:
Arnold Cleaners, Inc., Han Hoi Joo, Arnold Palmer Cleaners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Bel Air Mart et al v. Arnold Cleaners, Inc. et al
as 2:2010at01300
Plaintiff:
Bel Air Mart and Wong Family Investors, L.P.
Defendant:
Arnold Cleaners, Inc., Han Hoi Joo, Arnold Palmer Cleaners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Armstrong v. Grams
as 3:2009cv00483
Petitioner:
Ralph Armstrong
Defendant:
Greg Grams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Eagle Rock Entertainment Incorporated
as 2:2009cv11704
Plaintiff:
Ralphe Armstrong and Ralphe Armstrong
Defendant:
Eagle Rock Entertainment Incorporated and Eagle Rock Entertainment Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Armstrong v. Norris
as 4:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Ralph Armstrong
Defendant:
Larry B Norris
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
