Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ralph Wilson, Jr. v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
as 23-2122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH JAMES WILSON, JR., d/b/a Ralph Wilson Jr. Law Firm, LLC, Personally and as Agent/Owner/Operator of Ralph Wilson Law PC
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, ASHLEY JOLDA, individually and as an employee of South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, KEVIN STRICKLAND, as employee of South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and others
Defendant:
HORRY COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MATHEW CHIVATTONI, as an employee of Myrtle Beach Police Department, OFFICER SHANNON, as an employee of Myrtle Beach Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Darlene Rodgers
Defendant:
Taura McDaniel, Val Price, Ralph Wilson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Gregory v. Ralph Wilson, Jr., et al
as 12-3678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James C. Gregory
Defendant - Appellee:
Ralph Wilson, Jr., Curtis Walker, Ross Thompson and others
Gregory v. Wilson et al
as 3:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
James C Gregory
Defendant:
Ralph Wilson, Jr , Curtis Walker , Ross Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. State of Arkansas et al
as 4:2012cv01355
Plaintiff:
James C. Gregory
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, City of Blytheville, Arkansas, Ralph Wilson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Wilson et al
as 3:2012cv00182
Plaintiff:
James C Gregory
Defendant:
Ralph Wilson, Jr and Mike Bearden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Wilson et al
as 4:2012cv01105
Plaintiff:
James C. Gregory
Defendant:
Ralph Wilson, Jr. and Mike Bearden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Dunn et al
as 4:2007cv00650
Plaintiff:
Leamon Bradley Todd
Defendant:
Jim Dunn, Ralph Wilson, World Bank,The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
