Cases 21 - 30 of 15,648
Ramirez v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramirez
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Ramirez v. Ameresco, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Hugo Ramirez
Defendant:
Ameresco, Inc. and Bernard Nickels Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Group Fifty Eight LLC v. Mercedes Ramirez et al
as 2:2024cv03696
Plaintiff:
Group Fifty Eight LLC
Defendant:
Mercedes Ramirez, Steven Martinez, Marizza Garcia and others
Hamka v. Ramirez
as 2:2024cv11181
Plaintiff:
Mr. Khodr Hamka
Defendant:
Mr. Paul Wyatt Ramirez, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Sheppard v. Matushak et al
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sheppard and Antonio Decarlo Sheppard, Jr
Defendant:
Lt Anthony Matushak, Jody Perttu, CO Mayor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Standard Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
Virginia Ramirez
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Godinez-Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-2788
Petitioner:
ANABEL GODINEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ramirez Escobar v. Walmart Stores Texas, LLC
as 4:2024cv01652
Plaintiff:
Mauro Harold Ramirez Escobar
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
