Cases 1 - 10 of 35
US v. Randolph Spain
as 26-4125
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RANDOLPH JOHNSON SPAIN
Blacharski v. Laureys et al
as 3:2025cv01099
Plaintiff:
Brandyn Blacharski and Brandyn Michael Blacharski
Defendant:
Rodney G Laureys, Frank Schaffer, Damon Leichty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph Johnson v. Larry High
as 25-6805
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
LARRY HIGH and CAROLINE CORRECTIONAL UNIT #2
Johnson v. High et al
as 3:2025cv00073
Plaintiff:
Randolph Johnson
Defendant:
Larry High and Caroline Corr Unit #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Randolph Johnson
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Denita R Ball, William Duckert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera Diaz et al v. Peterson et al
as 2:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reedy, Sylvester Thomas, Antonio Brooks and others
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Denita R Ball, Cpt William Dokert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Almo Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Randolph Johnson
Defendant:
Almo Corporation and Almo Distributing Wisconsin Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Dunbar
as 5:2022cv03677
Petitioner:
Phillip Randolph Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
R S Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
Charles Randolph Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00298
Petitioner:
Charles Randolph Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
