Cases 11 - 20 of 60
USA v. Randy Thomas
as 15-12101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDY ANTONIO THOMAS
Thomas v. Comprehensive Options For Drug Abusers, Inc
as 3:2014cv01843
Defendant:
Comprehensive Options For Drug Abusers, Inc
Plaintiff:
Randy J. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Thomas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv12289
Plaintiff:
Tammy M. Thomas and Randy L. Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randy Thomas v. Ronald Chapman
as 13-1565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. THOMAS, and as Father, Next of Friend, Natural Guardian, and on behalf of A.T.T.
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD L. CHAPMAN, In his Official and Personal Capacity, CHRISTY T. MANN, Judge, In her Official and Personal Capacity, GEORGE E. BATTLE, III, In his Official and Personal Capacity and others
Randy Thomas v. North Carolina Dept. of Health
as 13-1557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SECTION
Randy Thomas v. Aida Correa
as 13-1556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
AIDA CORREA
Thomas v. Chevron U S A Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00860
Plaintiff:
Randy Mitchell Thomas
Defendant:
Chevron U S A Inc and Texaco Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Thomas v. Texaco Co Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
Randy Mitchell Thomas
Defendant:
Texaco Inc and Chevron U S A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Thomas v. Chapman et al
as 5:2011cv00694
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Thomas
Defendant:
Ronald L. Chapman, Christy T. Mann, George E. Battle, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01789
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
