Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Conn Appliances, Inc. v. Vargas
as 4:2018cv04666
Respondent:
Raul Vargas
Petitioner:
Conn Appliances, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Valencia v. United States Of America
as 2:2018cv00080
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Raul Vargas Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Raul Carmona
as 18-40577
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL VARGAS CARMONA
USA v. Raul Vargas-Ortiz
as 16-50516
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL VARGAS-ORTIZ, also known as Daniel Vargas
Terry Holcomb, Sr., et al v. Steven McCraw, et al
as 16-50435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY HOLCOMB, SR., SCOTT SMITH, AMOS JAMES POSTELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN MCCRAW, In His Personal Capacity, JOSE ORTIZ, In His Personal Capacity, JOHN PELATH, In His Personal Capacity and others
USA v. Raul Vargas-Zapata
as 15-50772
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL VARGAS-ZAPATA, also known as Raul Alfonzo Vargas Zapata
Trustees of the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare and Pension Funds v. Vargas
as 1:2015cv06999
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare and Pension Funds
Defendant:
Raul Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Bristol-Gonzalgo v. United States Department of the Navy et al
as 2:2012cv02043
Plaintiff:
Maria Jean Bristol-Gonzalgo
Defendant:
United States Department of the Navy, Raul Vargas and Jane Doe Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Vargas v. Lonigro et al
as 1:2011cv01171
Plaintiff:
Raul Vargas
Defendant:
Anthony S. Lonigro, R. Taherpour, Randolph Wilson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2009cv00400
Plaintiff:
Raul Vargas
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Department of Corrections and Ashbel T. Wall, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
