Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 69
In Re: Raymond Perry
as 16-609
Movant: In re: RAYMOND LEWIS PERRY
:
Can Capital Asset Servicing, Inc. v. Baytown Bolt & Supply, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00534
Plaintiff: Can Capital Asset Servicing, Inc.
Defendant: Baytown Bolt & Supply, Inc. and Raymond Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Cowan et al
as 9:2015cv00771
Plaintiff: Raymond Lewis
Defendant: B. Cowan, Alberta Blaine and Ms. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. New York State Department of Correction et al
as 9:2015cv00265
Plaintiff: Raymond Lewis
Defendant: New York State Department of Correction, Albany Medical Center Hospital, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. New York State Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv01610
Plaintiff: Raymond Lewis
Defendant: New York State Department of Correction, Albany Medical Center (Hospital), John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Raymond Perry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-6207
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAYMOND LEWIS PERRY
Brandon v. Persson
as 6:2014cv00117
Petitioner: Raymond Lewis Brandon
Respondent: Rob Persson
503) 947-4794 (fax: Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21322
Plaintiff: Raymond Lewis
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. USA
as 2:2013cv00230
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Raymond Lewis Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lewis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07192
Plaintiff: Dianne M. Lewis and Raymond Lewis
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?