Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Graves v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv03230
Plaintiff:
MOTIQUE GRAVES and Malik Tyquarn Graves
Defendant:
The City of New York, City of New York Police Department, P.O. CHRISTIAN SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Sanchez
as 21-1328
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO RAYMOND SANCHEZ
Bailey v. Sanchez8 Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00332
Defendant:
Sanchez8 Incorporated, Raymond Sanchez, Jr., Bell Sanchez8 Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Jake Bailey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Raymond Sanchez v. Riverside County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2020cv01728
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Blanco and Riverside County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Raymond Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. City of Las Cruces et al
as 1:2019cv00767
Defendant:
Officer R Lattura, Thomas Medina, Third Judicial District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Spencer (Reese)
as 18-1056
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cameron Spencer, Jr., AKA C.J., Miguel Luciano, AKA Goti, Dakota Beverly, AKA Chinx and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Deshawn Reese, AKA Day Day
USA v. Raymond Sanchez Lopez
as 17-11043
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND SANCHEZ LOPEZ
Sanchez v. USA
as 2:2016cv00095
Petitioner:
Raymond Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanchez v. Coursey et al
as 1:2015cv02063
Plaintiff:
Raymond Sanchez
Defendant:
Daniel M. Coursey, Jr., Robert James, Matt McCoyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Stephens et al
as 5:2015cv00007
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Raymond Sanchez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
