Cases 1 - 10 of 100
JOHNSON v. RILEY et al
as 1:2026cv02582
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
GREG RILEY, MICHAEL LEDUC, KEYBANK CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Foley et al
as 5:2026cv06125
Plaintiff:
Kaila Chambers
Defendant:
Trevor Foley, Ryan Crews, Kenneth Chris McBee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber v. Reardon et al
as 3:2026cv01040
Plaintiff:
Alexander Barber
Defendant:
Reardon and Letourneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Scott et al
as 1:2026cv05573
Plaintiff:
Robert Willie Johnson
Defendant:
Lewis Scott, John Reardon, Greg Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REARDON v. WALKER et al
as 1:2026cv00319
Plaintiff:
ENJOINED FILER NATHAN REARDON
Defendant:
LANCE E WALKER, ASHLEY HADAM and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: Reardon
as 26-1654
Petitioner:
NATHAN REARDON
Respondent:
MITCHELL OSWALD, in the individual capacity and BANGOR DAILY NEWS
Associated General Contractors of New York State, LLC et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2026cv01139
Plaintiff:
Associated General Contractors of New York State, LLC, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., Buisness Counsel of New York State and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Roberta Reardon, Shaun McCready and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Reardon
as 26-1584
Petitioner:
NATHAN REARDON
Respondent:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNITED STATES
BROWN III v. VICTORIA KUHN et al
as 1:2026cv05841
Plaintiff:
MORGAN BROWN III
Defendant:
NJ DOC, VICTORIA KUHN, MARC SIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
