Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Rector v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Lonnie Henry Rector, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rector v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Rector, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rector, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Rector, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rector v. Strid
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Kody D Rector
Respondent:
Myles Strid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. San Francisco FBI et al
as 5:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Henry Desean Adams
Defendant:
San Francisco FBI, Special Agent in Charge "Supervisor", Kabli Adodotat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rector v. Lewis et al
as 8:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Seuvarrggio S Rector
Respondent:
Sheriff Lewis, Captain John Vandermosten and Warden of the Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Shelton v. Mathena, et al
as 7:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
Rector, Tracy Mathena, Tim Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Crews et al
as 5:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Carlos Thurman
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Brad Adams, Sergeant Rector and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Rector v. FBI
as 22-5065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Rector
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Bonner v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Cookie Crews, Brad Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
