Cases 41 - 50 of 1,236
International Watchman, Inc. v. Reeds Wilmington Jewelers, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02396
Plaintiff:
International Watchman, Inc.
Defendant:
Reeds Wilmington Jewelers, Inc., Big Idea Design, LLC, M. LaHart & Company, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tucker v. Quinones et al
as 5:2023cv13120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Tucker
Defendant:
Nicole Michelle Quinones and Rio Reed
Thompson v. DeAngelo et al
as 2:2023cv13049
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Jodi DeAngelo, Paul Schreiber, Brittany McClain and others
Reed v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01258
Petitioner:
Jason William Reed
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Niekamp et al. v. Watts Guerra LLP et al.
as 3:2023cv02289
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Niekamp and Randall D. Hebrink
Defendant:
Watts Guerra LLP, Bassford Remele PA, Gustafson Gluek PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thompson v. DeWine et al
as 2:2023cv03930
Plaintiff:
Arthur Vernell Thompson
Defendant:
Mike DeWine, James Haviland, Larry Bodell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Luke Reed v. Joe Stewart, et al
as 23-6016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUKE DAVISON REED
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE STEWART, Ted Lavit Law Firm and KALEN REED, Circuit 11 Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
