Cases 1 - 10 of 838
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Ricky Johnson v. Regional Director, CCA, et al
as 24-11060
Plaintiff:
RICKY J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR, CCA, SHARON LEWIS and THOMAS FERRELL
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
Anderson v. Monroe
as 6:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Regional Director Carol Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. TDCJ-ID et al
as 7:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. White, Sr.
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID, Food Service and Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Gillens v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6227
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRUCE GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, BOP Director, DOE #1, unknown mail staff/supervisor, KENNETH CRADDOCK, Discipline Hearing Officer and others
WOODBERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
IRA KNIGHT and REGIONAL DIRECTOR CENTRAL OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Bridges v. Collier et al
as 9:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Scotty J. Bridges
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Regional Director, Unknown Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael L. Overton v. Warden CMC East et al
as 2:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Overton
Defendant:
Warden CMC East, Bank of the West C.E.O., Kevin Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overton v. Warden CMC East et al
as 4:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Overton
Defendant:
Warden CMC East, Bank of the West C.E.O., Kevin Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
