Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. M&A Arrow Trucking Corp.
as 1:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Renard Johnson
Defendant:
M&A Arrow Trucking Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Burnett v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv03278
Defendant:
Tony Renard Johnson, Sheriff Jay Koon, Nathan Twigg and others
Plaintiff:
Judy D. Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Johnson v. Marty Boyd, et al
as 16-3237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick Renard Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Marty Boyd, Sheriff, Craighead County Jail, Moore, Sheriff, Craighead County Jail, Barnett, Officer, Craighead County Jail and others
Johnson v. Boyd et al
as 3:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Derrick Renard Johnson
Defendant:
Marty Boyd, Moore, Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Kelvin Johnson
as 11-30371
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KELVIN RENARD JOHNSON, AKA Boo
Johnson v. Thompson et al
as 2:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
Derrick Renard Johnson
Defendant:
Dale K. Thompson, Bill Rasco, Amy Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kemp et al
as 2:2010cv00100
Plaintiff:
Derrick Renard Johnson
Defendant:
Kemp, Stewart, Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv01525
Petitioner:
Steven Renard Johnson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calvin Barnes v. Renard Johnson
as 09-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN BARNES and CHRISTINE BARNES
Plaintiff:
SHRECO T. BURNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RENARD JOHNSON, APPLE TITLE INTERNATIONAL, LLC and WILL PURCELL
Defendant - None:
MONTGOMERY CAPITAL CORPORATION and MICHAL JOHNSON, Individual and Official Agent of Montgomery Capital Corp.
Barnes et al v. Johnson et al
as 8:2008cv01056
Plaintiff:
Calvin Barnes, Christine Barnes and Shreco T. Burnett
Defendant:
Renard Johnson, Apple Title International, LLC, Will Purcell and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
