Cases 1 - 10 of 100
RENZI v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv01156
Petitioner:
LOUISE RENZI
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Havlish et al v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv03555
Plaintiff:
Fiona Havlish, William Havlish, Russa Steiner and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Enforcement of Judgment
Mcneil Brown v. Lt. Saritelli et al
as 1:2026cv00288
Plaintiff:
JaJuan Mcneil Brown
Defendant:
Lt. Saritelli, Capt. Macomber and C.O Renzy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Durrenberger et al
as 1:2026cv05257
Plaintiff:
Phillip Edward Rogers
Defendant:
Raymond Durrenberger, Michael J. Renzi and Joshi
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Netflix, Inc., et al.
as 26-2339
Plaintiff:
RENZIE WILSON PRICE
Defendant:
NETFLIX, INC., DENNIS LIU, JASON PIPERBERG and others
McDaniel v. Glassgow et al
as 1:2026cv03836
Plaintiff:
Brian McDaniel
Defendant:
James Glassgow, Mike Renzi, Julie Primosic and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Family of Eastman Trust et al v. County of Jefferson Probation et al
as 5:2026cv00436
Plaintiff:
The Family of Eastman Trust and Jessica Rose Eastman
Defendant:
The State of New York, Hon. David A. Renzi, Richard V. Naumiec and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slocum, Jr. v. Pond et al
as 2:2026cv00023
Plaintiff:
James D. Slocum, Jr.
Defendant:
Froy Pond, Renzy Hizzer, Mr. Tony Unknown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson Price v. Netflix, Inc.
as 26-1343
Plaintiff:
RENZIE WILSON PRICE
Defendant:
NETFLIX, INC., DENNIS LIU, JASON PIPERBERG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
