Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PLendarvis v. Churchill County et al
as 3:2014cv00203
Defendant:
Churchill County and Richard V. Davis
Plaintiff:
Pamela Pendarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Davis, III v. Folsom Cordova Unified School, et al
as 13-15868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD D. DAVIS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
FOLSOM CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, JOHN DIXON, ROBERT REED and others
Bey v. Wisconsin Department of Children and Families et al
as 2:2012cv01141
Plaintiff:
Shanquil Lashay Bey
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Children and Families, Eliose Anderson, Reggie Bicha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Keasler
as 3:2012cv04357
Plaintiff:
Richard Keith Davis
Defendant:
Mike Keasler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Malatinsky et al
as 2:2012cv13761
Plaintiff:
Richard V. Davis, II
Defendant:
William Malatinsky and Milan Medical Director
Elbey v. Dayton Police Officers et al
as 1:2011cv00951
Plaintiff:
Olakwesu Y. Elbey
Defendant:
Richard Scott Davis, Michael Siekierka, Steven G. Abney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELBEY v. DAYTON POLICE OFFICERS et al
as 3:2011cv00154
Plaintiff:
OLAKWSESU ELBEY
Defendant:
DAYTON POLICE OFFICERS, Richard Scott Davis, Michael Siekierka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Folsom Cordova Unified School District et al
as 2:2011cv01242
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Davis, III
Defendant:
Folsom Cordova Unified School District , John Dixon, Robert - Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELBEY v. DAYTON POLICE OFFICERS et al
as 1:2011cv00537
Defendant:
STEVEN G. ABNEY, TYRONE BONNER, ANDREW BOOHER and others
Plaintiff:
OLAKWSESU ELBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
