Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017at00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rimer et al v. Coumou et al
as 3:2017cv00281
Defendant:
Clark County Commissioners, Clark, County of, Lucinda Coumou and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Lancaster, Brian Kerry O'Keefe, Stanley Rimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER et al v. CITY OF JOHNSTOWN et al
as 3:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN MILLER , KASANDARA MCINTIRE and B.M.
Defendant:
CITY OF JOHNSTOWN , EAST TAYLOR TOWNSHIP and EAST CONEMAUGH BOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 3:2016cv02204
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Police, Trooper John Doe, Luzerne County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smuda v. Anderson et al
as 3:2016cv00335
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Smuda
Defendant:
Maggie Anderson and Wayne Stenehjem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bevel v. Happy Hospitality, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01817
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Bevel, Sr.
Defendant:
Rajbir Dhillon and Happy Hospitality, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
McCormick v. Tribune Company et al
as 1:2015cv05867
Defendant:
ANNew York, McCormick Tribune Foundation, Huntington Pavilion and others
Plaintiff:
Joanna Canzoneri McCormick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Brown v. Clements et al
as 3:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Brown
Defendant:
Ronnie Clements , Susan Brubbaker , Niraj Verma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 14-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW, BERNARD FREIDMAN, PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Hudson v. Tarnow et al
as 2:2013cv12604
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hudson
Defendant:
Arthur J Tarnow, Bernard Freidman, Paul Komives and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
