Cases 31 - 40 of 58
George et al v. Urban Settlement Services et al.
as 1:2013cv01819
Plaintiff:
Richard George , Steven Leavitt and Sandra Leavitt
Defendant:
Urban Settlement Services and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
George v. Tiffin Motorhomes, Inc
as 3:2012cv02934
Plaintiff:
Richard George
Defendant:
Tiffin Motorhomes, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bailey v. USA
as 8:2012cv01511
Plaintiff:
Richard George Bailey
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Richard Mathew
as 12-11767
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD GEORGE MATHEWS
Ward v. County of Warren et al
as 5:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ward
Defendant:
County of Warren, Warren County Justice Court, Warren County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Essex Insurance Company v. Championship Charters, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Essex Insurance Company
Defendant:
Championship Charters, Inc., Joseph Clifton Champion, Richard George Coppick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2011cv13450
Plaintiff:
Shannon George and Richard George
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEBOON v. SCHMIDT et al
as 2:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. LEBOON
Defendant:
RICHARD GEORGE SCHMIDT , IMX MEDICAL MGMT SVCS. INC. and LIBERTY MUTUAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Midwood v. Secretary, Dept. of Corrections et al
as 5:2010cv00670
Petitioner:
Richard George Midwood, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Dept. of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benavidez v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv02390
Petitioner:
Richard George Benavidez
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Richard M Romley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
